Muddling through with climate change targets: a multi-level governance perspective on the transport sector

Greg Marsden, Antonio Ferreira, Ian Bache, Matthew Flinders and Ian Bartle

Climate Policy, 2014, vol. 14, issue 5, 617-636

Abstract: The UK Climate Change Act 2008 commits to a reduction of 80% in national GHG emissions by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. This article explores what happens next where these top-level aspirations are expected to be turned into radical action. It does so through examination of the transport sector, which is a highly complex, fragmented, and multi-level delivery environment. The research draws on cases studies of four major cities with different governance structures within the two distinct, yet connected, national contexts of England and Scotland. It integrates a range of theoretical legacies, namely 'muddling through', multi-level governance, and positional analysis, to look across governmental layers and out to non-governmental actors at all levels. Underneath the 80% target, the framework for action remains unclear. Lower-tiered authorities report difficulties in acting in a more comprehensive or rapid manner than upper tiers of government, largely because of the potential costs involved and a significant resource dependency on national governments. Ambition is also tempered by conflicts with economic growth objectives and the difficulties in aligning the objectives of the myriad of public and private organizations that need to take action. Policy relevance The transport sector is seen to be a difficult sector in which to achieve early cuts in carbon emissions. Understanding how to mobilize the many public- and private-sector actors in the transport sector is a key challenge to be addressed in many developed countries. This article provides practical insights from real decision makers about the difficulties that a slow incremental strategy creates. Whilst it builds flexibility into future decision making, it also leads to short-termism and generates uncertainty about investment and policy choices. This allows carbon policy to be crowded out by other agendas, most notably economic growth. Whilst there are aspirations for green growth strategies that grow jobs and substantially cut carbon, these remain elusive in the transport sector, with major new infrastructure often stimulating more carbon consumption. A clearer framework for carbon management is necessary if sound long-term mitigation policies are to be put in place.

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2014.905823 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:14:y:2014:i:5:p:617-636

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tcpo20

DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.905823

Access Statistics for this article

Climate Policy is currently edited by Professor Michael Grubb

More articles in Climate Policy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().