EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation: A “one home run is much better than two doubles” criterion

Mostafa Davtalab-Olyaie

Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2019, vol. 70, issue 5, 807-816

Abstract: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a mathematical programming approach for assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units (DMUs). The cross-efficiency evaluation is an extension of DEA that provides a ranking method and eliminates unrealistic DEA weighting schemes on weight restrictions, without requiring a prior information. The cross-efficiency evaluation may have some shortages, e.g. the cross-efficiency scores may not be unique due to the presence of several optima. To rectify this issue, several secondary goals have been proposed in the literature. Some scholars have proposed several cross-efficiency evaluations based on maximising (minimising) the total deviation from their ideal point as an aggressive (benevolent) perspective. In some cases, minimising (maximising) the number of DMUs that achieve their target efficiencies, is more important than maximising (minimising) the total deviation from the ideal point. We propose some alternative models for the cross-efficiency evaluation based on the cardinality of the set of “satisfied DMUs”, i.e. the DMUs that achieve their maximum efficiencies. For aggressive (benevolent) cross-efficiency evaluation, among all the optimal weights for a specific unit, we choose the weights which can maximise its efficiency, and at the same time minimise (maximise) the number of satisfied units. We demonstrate how the proposed method can be implemented and illustrate the method using two examples.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2018.1457482 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:70:y:2019:i:5:p:807-816

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tjor20

DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2018.1457482

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Operational Research Society is currently edited by Tom Archibald

More articles in Journal of the Operational Research Society from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:70:y:2019:i:5:p:807-816