Evaluating Transport Infrastructure Investments: The Dutch Experience with a Standardized Approach
Jan Anne Annema,
Carl Koopmans and
Bert Van Wee
Transport Reviews, 2006, vol. 27, issue 2, 125-150
Abstract:
The Dutch government introduced a requirement in 2000 to evaluate proposed major infrastructure plans using a cost--benefit analysis (CBA) following published guidelines. Since then 13 new major infrastructure projects have been evaluated. The paper reviews the Dutch standardized CBA practice since 2000. The overall conclusion is that the use of standardized CBA has improved the quality of ex‐ante evaluations of large infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. However, the relatively young CBA practice has not yet fulfilled its full potential. About half of the CBAs analysed can be considered as being suitable for helping decision‐making. The other half has weaknesses with respect to methods and assumptions. Looking at the standardized CBA’s influence on policy‐making, the most important conclusion is that unfavourable CBA results have contributed to the postponement of decisions and to the downsizing of projects.
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441640600843237 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:transr:v:27:y:2006:i:2:p:125-150
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/TTRV20
DOI: 10.1080/01441640600843237
Access Statistics for this article
Transport Reviews is currently edited by Professor David Banister and Moshe Givoni
More articles in Transport Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().