Estimating Trade Misinvoicing from Bilateral Trade Statistics: The Devil is in the Details

Keejae P. Hong and Simon J. Pak

The International Trade Journal, 2017, vol. 31, issue 1, 3-28

Abstract: Trade misinvoicing, an important channel of illicit financial flows, is frequently estimated by the partner-country trade data comparison method. However, this method relies on a critical but incorrect assumption that the trade statistics in partner countries exhibit no misinvoicing. This study proves that the assumption of no misinvoicing in partner countries cannot be supported, raising serious doubts about the reliability of the method and a possibility that inappropriate policy decisions may be made based on the erroneous estimates of trade misinvoicing. We introduce an alternative method to estimate trade misinvoicing which does not rely on the trade statistics of partner countries.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08853908.2016.1202160 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:uitjxx:v:31:y:2017:i:1:p:3-28

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/uitj20

DOI: 10.1080/08853908.2016.1202160

Access Statistics for this article

The International Trade Journal is currently edited by George R. G. Clarke

More articles in The International Trade Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().