US Business Cycles from 1971-2010: A Post Keynesian Explanation

John Harvey

No 201004, Working Papers from Texas Christian University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Curiously and in spite of its name, very few business cycle theories actually treat it as a cycle. Mainstream economics, for example, models all macroeconomic fluctuations as a function of exogenous forces. In their view, the economy remains at full employment indefinitely unless impacted by some external event. Post Keynesian economists disagree strongly with this characterization, arguing instead that business-cycle fluctuations are endogenously generated. The goal of this paper is to compare the explanatory power of four business cycle models–three mainstream and one Post Keynesian–for the US economy since 1971. While the test employed is a simple one, the results are very clear: no model’s performance comes even close to that of the one based on Keynes’ seventy-year old analysis.

Keywords: business cycle; Keynes; Post Keynesian (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E12 E13 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2010-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.tcu.edu/RePEc/tcu/wpaper/wp10-04.pdf First version, 2010 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tcu:wpaper:201004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Texas Christian University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John Harvey ().