Search Frictions, Competing Mechanisms and Optimal Market Segmentation
Xiaoming Cai,
Pieter Gautier and
Ronald Wolthoff
Additional contact information
Xiaoming Cai: Tongji University, PR China
No 16-036/VI, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
Abstract:
In a market in which sellers compete for heterogeneous buyers by posting mechanisms, we analyze how the properties of the meeting technology affect the allocation of buyers to sellers. We show that a separate submarket for each type of buyer is the efficient outcome if and only if meetings are bilateral. In contrast, a single market with all agents is optimal if and only if the meeting technology satisfies a novel condition, which we call "joint concavity." Both outcomes can be decentralized by sellers posting auctions combined with a fee that is paid by (or to) all buyers with whom the seller meets. Finally, we compare joint concavity to two other properties of meeting technologies, invariance and non-rivalry, and explain the differences.
Keywords: search frictions; matching function; meeting technology; competing mechanisms; heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 D44 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-05-17
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth and nep-ore
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/16036.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Search frictions, competing mechanisms and optimal market segmentation (2017) 
Working Paper: Search Frictions, Competing Mechanisms and Optimal Market Segmentation (2016) 
Working Paper: Search Frictions, Competing Mechanisms and Optimal Market Segmentation (2016) 
Working Paper: Search Frictions, Competing Mechanisms and Optimal Market Segmentation (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20160036
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (discussionpapers@tinbergen.nl).