Cost benefit analysis vs. referenda

Martin Osborne and Matthew Turner

Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics

Abstract: We consider a planner who chooses between two possible public policies and ask whether a referendum or a cost benefit analysis leads to higher welfare. We find that a referendum leads to higher welfare than a cost benefit analyses in "common value" environments. Cost benefit analysis is better in "private value" environments.

Keywords: Cost benefit analysis; elections; referenda; project evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H11 H43 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27 pages
Date: 2007-04-13
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-pbe
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/public/workingPapers/tecipa-286.pdf Main Text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-286

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Toronto, Department of Economics 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RePEc Maintainer ().