Two Sides of a Medal: The Changing Relationship between Religious Diversity and Religiosity
Matthias Opfinger
No 2013-06, Research Papers in Economics from University of Trier, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Religious Market Theory assigns basic market principles to the market for religion. The derived supply side model proposes that religiosity is higher on a competitive market, characterized by high religious diversity. Churches will provide higher quality goods compared to monopolistic churches. The demand side model, originating from the Secularization Hypothesis, suggests that the establishment of new churches casts doubt on the existing religion, which reduces overall religiosity. I find a negative linear relationship between religious diversity and religiosity which supports the demand side model. However, high levels of income, education, and democracy mitigate this effect. The relationship becomes positive in the most developed countries. The demand side model seems to dominate in less developed countries, while the supply side model better describes the market for religion after Secularization has occurred.
Keywords: Supply side; Demand side; interaction; attenuating effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D4 O1 Z12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20 pages
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb4/prof/VWL/EWF/Research_Papers/2013-06.pdf First version, 2013 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Two Sides of a Medal: the Changing Relationship between Religious Diversity and Religiosity (2014) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a99/a2a99334441876f0a1fb68370294e15c57cd9b04" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Two Sides of a Medal: The Changing Relationship between Religious Diversity and Religiosity (2013) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a99/a2a99334441876f0a1fb68370294e15c57cd9b04" alt="Downloads"
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:trr:wpaper:201306
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Research Papers in Economics from University of Trier, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Matthias Neuenkirch (neuenkirch@uni-trier.de).