Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence

Daniel Chen, Vardges Levonyan and Susan Yeh

No 16-58, IAST Working Papers from Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST)

Abstract: Whether policies shift preferences is relevant to policy design. We exploit the random assignment of U.S. federal judges creating geographically local precedent and the fact that judges’ politics, religion, and race predict decision-making in abortion jurisprudence. Instrumenting for abortion jurisprudence with exogenous judicial characteristics, we estimate the impact of abortion jurisprudence on state laws, campaign donations, and abortion attitudes. We verify information transmission in that pro-life abortion jurisprudence caused restrictive state laws and increased campaign donations to pro-choice causes. Pro-choice abortion decisions shifted preferences against legalized abortion in the short-run, but in the longer-run, abortion views followed court decisions. Pro-choice decisions affected Republicans while pro-life decisions affected Democrats. Counterfactual exercises suggest that had abortion cases in the last half-century been decided the opposite way, the increase in pro-life attitudes among Republicans would have been steeper and Democrats would have been more pro-choice. Our estimates complement a historical narrative that turning to the courts to vindicate rights often led to resistance and subsequent acceptance and we present a model consistent with these facts.

Keywords: Backlash; Expressive Law; Abortion; Norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 P48 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://iast.fr/pub/31139
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2928175 Full Text

Related works:
Working Paper: Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tse:iastwp:31139

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAST Working Papers from Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().