Automated Classification of Modes of Moral Reasoning in Judicial Decisions

Elliott Ash, Daniel L. Chen, Nischal Mainali and Liam Meier

No 18-92, IAST Working Papers from Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST)

Abstract: What modes of moral reasoning do judges employ? We construct a linear SVM classifier for moral reasoning mode trained on applied ethics articles written by consequentialists and deontologists. The model can classify a paragraph of text in held out data with over 90 percent accuracy. We then apply this classifier to a corpus of circuit court opinions. We show that the use of consequentialist reasoning has increased over time. We report rankings of relative use of reasoning modes by legal topic, by judge, and by judge law school.

Date: 2018-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big and nep-law
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://iast.fr/pub/33158
http://users.nber.org/~dlchen/papers/Automated_Cla ... onalLegalStudies.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Automated Classification of Modes of Moral Reasoning in Judicial Decisions (2023)
Working Paper: Automated Classification of Modes of Moral Reasoning in Judicial Decisions (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tse:iastwp:33158

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAST Working Papers from Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().