Défis et embûches dans l’évaluation des PPP: Pour un secteur public efficace et efficient
Marcel Boyer
No 20-1104, TSE Working Papers from Toulouse School of Economics (TSE)
Abstract:
The choice of the mode of realization of large public investment projects, including large infrastructure projects, between the conventional mode (PSC - public sector comparator) and the PPP mode (public-private partnership), involves two major groups of challenges and pitfalls. These are not the only major challenges and pitfalls, but they are the most pervasive. First, the evaluation of the investments themselves: the (uncertain) forecast of the costs and benefits of the project, the identification and management of real and financial risks, the cost of capital and the discount rate. Then, the evaluation of "contracts" or more generally of the "governance" PSC vs. PPP in imperfect and incomplete information contexts: the role and power of incentives for performance, effectiveness and efficiency. Many documents and reports reveal a serious misunderstanding of the economic analysis of the value of a public project, an inadequate or even erroneous understanding of the rules of modern finance, in addition to errors in analytical logic that make reports fatally flawed.
Keywords: Health; Education; Infrastructures; Evaluation of public projects; mode of realization; PSC; PPP; incentive contract; incomplete information. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/docu ... 2020/wp_tse_1104.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Défis et embûches dans l’évaluation des PPP: Pour un secteur public efficace et efficient (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tse:wpaper:124283
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in TSE Working Papers from Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().