The Impact of Reforming Energy Subsidies, Cash Transfers, and Taxes on Inequality and Poverty in Ghana and Tanzania

Stephen Younger ()
Additional contact information
Stephen Younger: Department of Economics, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY.

No 55, Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series from Tulane University, Department of Economics

Abstract: The paper explains methods developed by the Commitment to Equity Institute to simulate policy changes and uses them to assess the distributional consequences of three types of policy reform in Ghana and Tanzania: removal of energy subsidies, expansion of conditional cash transfer programs, and shifts in the balance between indirect and direct taxation. The methods are simple to implement and provide a first-order approximation to the true distributional effects. In both countries energy subsidies are substantial and popular but regressive despite the use of lifeline tariffs for electricity consumption. Their removal would reduce inequality but also increase poverty by a non-trivial amount because the poor do garner some benefit from the subsidies. A simultaneous expansion of cash transfer programs could offset the poverty consequences at significantly lower fiscal cost than that of the energy subsidies. In both countries direct taxes are more progressive than indirect taxes, yet shifting taxation from indirect to direct taxes has relatively little effect on inequality and poverty because the incidence of the two is not so different as, for instance, the difference between taxes and a strongly progressive expenditure like conditional cash transfers.

Keywords: fiscal incidence; poverty; inequality; subsidy reform; Ghana; Tanzania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 H22 I14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15 pages
Date: 2016-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Commitment to Equity, November 2016, pages 1-15

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.tulane.edu/RePEc/ceq/ceq55.pdf Revised version, 2017 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tul:ceqwps:55

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series from Tulane University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nora Lustig ().