Diferencias en la efectividad de los canales de interacción sobre los beneficios obtenidos por investigadores y empresas en México
Gabriela Dutrénit,
Carla De Fuentes and
Arturo Torres
Additional contact information
Carla De Fuentes: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco
Arturo Torres: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco; Universidad de Ottawa, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Economía.
No 2710, Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) from Department of Economics - dECON
Abstract:
It is widely recognized that universities and public research centers, hereinafter referred to public research organizations (PROs) are producers and transmitters of knowledge, and as such can make important contributions both to increase the economic performance of firms and to solve societal problems.The process of knowledge transfer between PROs and industry occurs through multiple channels of interaction, however the effectiveness of different channels on the benefits perceived by both agents differs. Based on micro data of academic researchers and firms in Mexico, this paper explores what channels of interactions are the most effective for triggering different benefits received by researchers and firms involved in such interactions. We built two Heckman´s two-step estimation procedure models, one for researchers and one for firms. The first stage determines the drivers of interaction and then eliminates the selection bias, while the second identify the most important channels to benefit from interaction. Our findings suggest that researchers are knowledge driven rather than economic driven, as they valuate more Intellectual than Economic benefits. Firms perceive Production benefits as more important than Innovation benefits, which suggest that they tend to connect to PRO for short-term problem solving rather than to get insights for long-term innovative strategies. The Bi-directional channel (knowledge flows in both directions) is the most important in providing benefits for both researchers (intellectual benefits) and firms (Innovation and Production benefits). Dual benefits coming from this channel could contribute to building virtual circles for PRO-industry interaction. But other channels are only effective either for researchers (Traditional) or for firms (Services), which raise a policy issue about the need identified the drivers that explain the likelihood of firms and researchers to establish linkages. In the case of researchers, the drivers that explain the probability to connect with firms are: (i) skills (knowledge), academic collaboration and (iii) institutiponal affiliation. In the case of firms, the main are the following: (i) openness strategy (particularly open sources and suppliers) and fiscal incentives for R&D, and (ii) perception about the role of PRO for the creation and transfer of knowledge.
Keywords: university-industry linkages; collaboration drivers; channels of interaction; benefits; innovation policy; developing countries; Mexico. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L2 O31 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2010-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-ipr and nep-pr~
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/2181 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ude:wpaper:2710
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) from Department of Economics - dECON Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andrea Doneschi () and ().