Are Trade Marks and Patents Complementary or Substitute Protections for Innovation
Patrick Llerena and
Valentine Millot
Working Papers of BETA from Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg
Abstract:
The benefits of innovations for firms strongly depend on their ability to develop complementary appropriability means, including intellectual property (IP) rights. This paper aims at assessing the interrelated effects of two types of IP rights, namely patents and trade marks, considering them in their core function as legal protection devices. Based on a supermodularity analysis, we show that the complementary relationship between trade marks and patents is not straightforward. Depending on the levels of advertising spillovers and depreciation rate, trade marks are found to be either complementary or substitute to patents. Based on a data set encompassing the IP activity of a sample of French publicly traded firms, we find that patents and trade marks are complementary in chemical and pharmaceutical sectors, but substitute in high-tech business sectors (computer products and electrical equipment).
JEL-codes: L10 O32 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-ino, nep-ipr, nep-pr~, nep-knm and nep-tid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://beta.u-strasbg.fr/WP/2013/2013-01.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2013-01
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers of BETA from Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (webmaster@cournot.u-strasbg.fr this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).