Social Preferences and Public Economics: Are good laws a substitute for good citizens?
Samuel Bowles ()
Additional contact information
Samuel Bowles: Santa Fe Institute, University of Siena and University of Massachusetts
UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers from University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Laws and policies designed to harness self-regarding preferences to public ends may fail when they compromise the beneficial effects of pro-social preferences. Experimental evidence indicates that incentives that appeal to self interest may reduce the salience of intrinsic motivation, reciprocity, and other civic motives. Motivational crowding in also occurs. The evidence for these processes is reviewed and a model of optimal explicit incentives is presented. JEL Categories: D64, D52, H41, H21, Z13, C92
Keywords: Social preferences; implementation theory; incentive contracts; incomplete contracts; framing; behavioral experiments; motivational crowding out; ethical norms; constitutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-01, Revised 2008-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-cdm, nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-pbe, nep-pke and nep-soc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.umass.edu/economics/publications/2008-06.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ums:papers:2007-04
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers from University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics Thompson Hall, Amherst, MA 01003. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Daniele Girardi ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).