The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model and the Cambridge Capital Controversies

Kazuhiro Kurose (kurose@econ.tohoku.ac.jp) and Naoki Yoshihara (nyoshihara@econs.umass.edu)
Additional contact information
Kazuhiro Kurose: Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University

No 2016-05, UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers from University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper examines the validity of the factor price equalisation theorem (FPET) in relation to capital theory. Additionally, it presents a survey of the literature on Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson (HOS) models that treat capital as a primary factor, beginning with Samuelson (1953). Furthermore, this paper discusses the Cambridge capital controversy, which contends that marginal productivity theory does not hold when capital is assumed to be as a bundle of reproducible commodities instead of as a primary factor. Consequently, it is shown that under this assumption, the FPET does not hold, even when there is no reversal of capital intensity. This paper also demonstrates that the recent studies on the dynamic HOS trade theory generally ignore the di¢ culties posed by the capital controversies and are thereby able to conclude that the FPET holds even when capital is modelled as a reproducible factor. Our analysis suggests that there is a need for a basic theory of international trade that does not rely on factor price equalisation and a model that formulates capital as a bundle of reproducible commodities.

Keywords: factor price equalisation; capital as the bundle of reproducible commodities; reswitching of techniques; capital reversing. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B51 D33 F11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme, nep-hpe, nep-int, nep-ore and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.umass.edu/economics/publications/2016-05.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
Working Paper: The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model and the Cambridge capital controversies (2016)
Working Paper: The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model and the Cambridge Capital Controversies (2016)
Working Paper: The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model and the Cambridge Capital Controversies (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ums:papers:2016-05

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers from University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics Thompson Hall, Amherst, MA 01003. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Daniele Girardi (dgirardi@umass.edu this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).