How threatening are transformations of happiness scales to subjective wellbeing research?

Caspar Kaiser and Maarten C.M. Vendrik
Additional contact information
Maarten C.M. Vendrik: Macro, International & Labour Economics, Research Centre for Educ and Labour Mark, School of Business and Economics, RS: GSBE other - not theme-related research

No 32, Research Memorandum from Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE)

Abstract: Two recent papers argue that many results based on ordinal reports of happiness can be reversed with suitable monotonic increasing transformations of the associated happiness scale (Bond and Lang 2019; Schröder and Yitzhaki 2017). If true, empirical research utilizing such reports is in trouble. Against this background, we make four main contributions. First, we show that reversals are fundamentally made possible by explanatory variables having heterogenous effects across the distribution of happiness. We derive a simple test of whether reversals are possible by relabelling the scores of reported happiness and deduce bounds for ratios of coefficients under any labelling scheme. Second, we argue that in cases where reversals by relabelling happiness scores are impossible, reversals using an alternative method of Bond and Lang, which is based on ordered probit regressions, are highly speculative. Third, we make apparent that in order to achieve reversals, the analyst must assume that respondents use the response scale in a strongly non-linear fashion. However, drawing from the economic and psychological literature, we present arguments and evidence which suggest that respondents likely use response scales in an approximately linear manner. Fourth, using German SOEP data, we provide additional empirical evidence on whether reversals of effects of standard demographic variables are both possible and plausible. It turns out that reversals by either relabelling or by using Bond & Lang’s approach are impossible or implausible for almost all variables of interest. Although our analysis uses happiness as a special case, our theoretical considerations are applicable to any type of subjective ordinal report.

JEL-codes: C25 I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-12-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-hap
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/files/60175974/RM20032.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: How threatening are transformations of happiness scales to subjective wellbeing research? (2020)
Working Paper: How Threatening Are Transformations of Happiness Scales to Subjective Wellbeing Research? (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unm:umagsb:2020032

DOI: 10.26481/umagsb.2020032

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Memorandum from Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andrea Willems () and Leonne Portz ().