Exporting protection: EU trade agreements, geographical indications, and gastronationalism
M. Huysmans
No 19-26, Working Papers from Utrecht School of Economics
Abstract:
A key objective of EU trade policy is to obtain wider protection for its regional specialty foods, known as Geographical Indications (GIs). While the WTO imposes a minimum level of protection, the EU has successfully considered additional protection for its GIs a red line in recent trade agreements. In the EU, trade agreements are negotiated by the Commission but require member state approval. Both Greece and Italy have threatened not to ratify CETA over insufficient GI protection, so GIs clearly matter. This article provides and analyzes new data on GI protection in 11 recent EU trade agreements. It finds that EU trade agreements are more likely to protect GIs with higher sales values and from countries in the South of Europe, where GIs are highly salient because of gastronationalism. These findings illustrate how economic considerations and political mechanisms shape and enable EU policy exports
Keywords: Trade agreements; Geographical Indications; Intellectual Property; TRIPS; European Union (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int and nep-ipr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874 ... per_U.S.E._19_26.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:use:tkiwps:1926
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Utrecht School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marina Muilwijk ().