Critical Analysis of Some Well-Intended Proposals to Fight Unemployment

Gebhard Kirchgässner

University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2009 from Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen

Abstract: In this paper it is asked whether it is meaningful to state a ‘right to work’ as a basic human right to be written down in the constitution, for example, whether working time should generally be reduced, and whether those who do not have (or find) a job should get a guaranteed minimal income. All three demands have to be rejected, at least in the radical form in which they are often stated. They cannot be realised at all or at least not without impairing other basic human rights. Finally, it is asked what can be retained from these (usually well-intended) demands.

Keywords: Unemployment; Right to Work; Working Time; Negative Income Tax; Basic Income (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2009-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ux-tauri.unisg.ch/RePEc/usg/dp2009/DP-0917-Ki.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usg:dp2009:2009-17

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2009 from Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martina Flockerzi ().