The carrot vs. the stick in work team motivation
David Dickinson
No 2000-06, Working Papers from Utah State University, Department of Economics
Abstract:
This paper reports on the use of carrot (positive) and stick (negative) incentives as methods of increasing effort among members of work teams. We study teams of four members in a laboratory environment in which giving effort towards the team goal is simulated by eliciting voluntary contributions towards the provision of a public good. We test the efficiency improving properties of four distinct environments: monetary prizes given to high contributors versus monetary fines assessed to low contributors, where high/low contributor is defined first in terms of absolute contributions and then in terms of contributions relative to abilities—which we call handicapping. Our results show that both carrot and stick increase efficiency levels by 11-29%. We find that handicapped incentives promise the highest efficiency levels, and when handicapping is not used certain types of penalties may be more effective than prizes. The implications for work teams and suggestions for practical implementation are discussed.
Pages: 37 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-exp, nep-lab and nep-soc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.bus.usu.edu/RePEc/usu/pdf/ERI2000-06.pdf First version, 2000 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
Related works:
Journal Article: The Carrot vs. the Stick in Work Team Motivation (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usu:wpaper:2000-06
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Utah State University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John Gilbert (jgilbert@usu.edu).