Rhetorical Dualism and the Orthodox/Heterdox Distinction in Economics
Andrew Mearman ()
No 802, Working Papers from Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol
Abstract:
This paper attempts to combine elements of the approaches of two influential economists, Sheila Dow and Deirdre McCloskey and expands on previous work (2005) on Dow’s concept of dualism. A concept of rhetorical dualism is developed: dualism (defined variously) engaged in for a rhetorical purpose. It is argued by way of example case studies that rhetorical dualism is a significant feature of economics and that several influential authors have engaged in it. Further rhetorical dualism is shown to be prevalent in the current orthodox/heterodox distinction, and in the arguments of heterodox economists; but also that this distinction and type of distinction are unhelpful.
Keywords: Rhetoric; dualism; heterodox economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2008-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://carecon.org.uk/DPs/0802.pdf First version, 2008 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwe:wpaper:0802
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jo Michell ().