Integrating Life Cycle Assessment and Choice Analysis for Alternative Fuel Valuation

Bhavik Bakshi (), Nathan Cruze (), Tim Haab and Matthew Winden
Additional contact information
Bhavik Bakshi: Department of Chem. and Biom. Engineering, The Ohio State University
Nathan Cruze: Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University

Working Papers from UW-Whitewater, Department of Economics

Abstract: We develop a framework for modeling the technological, economic, environmental, and social impacts of the life cycle of seven transportation fuels (Corn, Stover, Switchgrass, Yellow Poplar, Newsprint and Municipal Solid Waste Ethanol Blends, as well as Gasoline), by linking engineering based life cycle analysis of transportation fuels with choice analysis techniques for eliciting and understanding the social preferences for multi-attribute consumption vectors. The use of life-cycle data allows us to account for a broad range of environmental, natural resource, and health effects over the entire production and consumption life cycle of each fuel. Combining these life cycle and stated choice analyses allows for social preferences to be established for the externalities resulting from the use of the different transportation fuels. This results in a unique physical-economic feedback model allowing for improved design and evaluation of transportation policy. Our results indicate first generation biofuels, such as Corn E10 and Corn E85, actually result in a net increase in the value of environmental damage, natural resource use and human health risk relative to gasoline. After accounting for life cycle costs, these popular “alternative” fuel options offer little apparent environmental or health benefits, calling into question policies encouraging their adoption as “green” fuels. For policies with the intent of reducing foreign oil dependency and encouraging resource conservation, these same fuels may have merit. Most of the cellulosic, or second generation, biofuels have the potential to create a net improvement in environmental, natural resource, and human health impacts. Our results indicate significant trade-offs between environmental damage, human health risks and resource depletion rates will have to be made in any attempt to implement alternative fuel policy at a national level.

Keywords: Life Cycle Impact Assessment; Choice Analysis; Fuel Valuation; Integration Techniques (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q42 Q48 Q51 Q53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2013-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-env, nep-res and nep-tre
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uww.edu/documents/colleges/cobe/economics/wpapers/13-01_Winden.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.uww.edu/documents/colleges/cobe/economics/wpapers/13-01_Winden.pdf [302 Found : Moved Temporarily]--> https://www.uww.edu/documents/colleges/cobe/economics/wpapers/13-01_Winden.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Integrating life-cycle assessment and choice analysis for alternative fuel valuation (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uww:wpaper:13-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from UW-Whitewater, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Yamin Ahmad ().