Measuring Consumers’ Willingness to Pay. Which Method Fits Best?
Klaus Miller (),
Hofstetter Reto (),
Krohmer Harley () and
Zhang Z. John ()
Additional contact information
Hofstetter Reto: Center for Customer Insight, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Krohmer Harley: Institute of Marketing and Management, University of Bern, Switzerland
Zhang Z. John: Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA
NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 2012, vol. 4, issue 1, 42-49
Abstract:
Gauging the maximum willingness to pay (WTP) of a product accurately is a critical success factor that determines not only market performance but also financial results. A number of approaches have therefore been developed to accurately estimate consumers’ willingness to pay. Here, four commonly used measurement approaches are compared using real purchase data as a benchmark. The relative strengths of each method are analyzed on the basis of statistical criteria and, more importantly, on their potential to predict managerially relevant criteria such as optimal price, quantity and profit. The results show a slight advantage of incentive-aligned approaches though the market settings need to be considered to choose the best-fitting procedure
Keywords: Market Research; Pricing; Demand Estimation; Willingness to Pay; Hypothetical Bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0040 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:42-49:n:5
DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0040
Access Statistics for this article
NIM Marketing Intelligence Review is currently edited by Christine Kittinger-Rosanelli
More articles in NIM Marketing Intelligence Review from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().