Early Lessons from Social Protection and Jobs Response to COVID-19 in Middle East andNorth Africa (MENA) Countries

Alex Kamurase and Emma Schwirck Willenborg

No 167319, Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes from The World Bank

Abstract: Countries in the Middle East and North Africa region quickly introduced measures to limit thespread of COVID-19 following the first confirmed cases. These measures included curfews, lockdowns, and socialdistancing. As a result of COVID-19 induced impacts, countries in the region adopted social protection measuresto mitigate the human and economic impacts of the pandemic. But most of the countries in MENA were already experiencingpoor macroeconomics brought on by the decline in oil prices and by fragility, conflict, and violence. Illness and lossof income due to the pandemic (largely from informal sources) exacerbated the extreme vulnerability faced by thepoor and vulnerable groups. Social protection programs, and particularly social safety nets (SSNs), can help householdsabsorb short-term consumption risk during periods of crisis and build resilience to manage future shocks. In MENA, 21countries and territories formally announced social protection measures to cope with the impacts of COVID-19.According to a Word Bank real-time review of social protection and jobs responses to COVID-19 (updated May2021), measures in MENA have spanned social assistance, social insurance, and labor markets programs. Socialassistance measures accounted for 59 percent of overall response, whereas social insurance and labor markets made up23 and 18 percent, respectively. Since the World Bank launched its COVID-19 response, Social Protection and Jobs(SPJ) support to MENA countries has been fast, flexible, and adaptive. The number of Bank-supported social safety netbeneficiaries increased from 2 million to 16 million in just 1.5 years of response which demonstrates that socialprotection systems in MENA are scalable and that country systems and programs are flexible to facilitate thisscalability. Early lessons suggest the World Bank significantly contributed to addressing financing,knowledge, and delivery needs based on existing lending and policy dialogue platforms, drawing on the experience in MENAas well as global learning. But lessons also suggest that social protection policy dialogue in MENA is even moreimportant moving forward, to help countries strengthen and boost policy reforms and to design and implement socialprotection programs and systems that can adequately, effectively, and efficiently target the poor and vulnerable,and be able to respond to population needs during disasters and shocks. This paper provides a documentation of thecontext for SPJ COVID19 response in MENA countries’, aframework for continued response and some of the early lessons learned.

Keywords: Social Protections & Assistance; Social Development & Poverty; Inequality; Labor Markets; Rural Labor Markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-12-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ara
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/84872164 ... a-MENA-Countries.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:167319

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes from The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aaron F Buchsbaum ().