Who Wins, Who Loses ? Understanding the Spatially Differentiated Effects of the Belt and Road Initiative
Somik V. Lall and
Mathilde Lebrand
No 8806, Policy Research Working Paper Series from The World Bank
Abstract:
This paper examines how cities and regions within countries are likely to adjust to trade openness and improved connectivity driven by large transport investments from China's Belt and Road Initiative. The paper presents a quantitative economic geography model alongside spatially detailed information on the location of people, economic activity, and transport costs to international gateways in Central Asia to identify which places are likely to gain and which places are likely to lose. The findings are that urban hubs near border crossings will disproportionately gain while farther out regions with little comparative advantage will be relative losers. Complementary investments in domestic transport networks and trade facilitation are complementary policies and can help in spatially spreading the benefits. However, barriers to domestic labor mobility exacerbate spatial inequalities whilst dampening overall welfare.
Date: 2019-04-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna, nep-int and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/29216155 ... -Road-Initiative.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Who wins, who loses? Understanding the spatially differentiated effects of the belt and road initiative (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:8806
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Policy Research Working Paper Series from The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Roula I. Yazigi ().