The Effect of Labour Relations Laws on Union Density Rates: Evidence from Canadian Provinces

Scott Legree, Tammy Schirle, Mikal Skuterud ()
Additional contact information
Scott Legree, Tammy Schirle, Mikal Skuterud: Wilfrid Laurier University
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Mikal Skuterud, Tammy Schirle and Scott Legree

LCERPA Working Papers from Laurier Centre for Economic Research and Policy Analysis

Abstract: We provide evidence on the potential for reforms in labour law to reverse deunionization trends by relating an index of the favorability to unions of Canadian provincial labour relations statutes to changes in provincial union density rates between 1981 and 2012. The results suggest that shifting every province’s 2012 legal regime to the most union-friendly possible could raise the national union density by up to 7 percentage points in the long run. This effect appears driven by regulations related to the certification of new bargaining units, the negotiation of first contracts and the recruitment of replacement workers. The effects of reform are largest for women, particularly university-educated women employed as professionals in public services. Overall, the results suggest a limited potential for labour relations reforms to address growing concerns about labour market inequality.

Keywords: Unions; labour relations; Canada (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J52 J53 K31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35
Date: 2014-09-08, Revised 2014-09-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-law
Note: LCERPA Working Paper No. 2014-12.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lcerpa.org/public/papers/LCERPA_2014_12.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: The Effect of Labour Relations Laws on Union Density Rates: Evidence from Canadian Provinces (2014)
Working Paper: The Effect of Labour Relations Laws on Union Density Rates: Evidence from Canadian Provinces (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wlu:lcerpa:0078

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LCERPA Working Papers from Laurier Centre for Economic Research and Policy Analysis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Glen Stewart ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).