Do Kinship Networks Strengthen Private Property? Evidence from Rural China

Taisu Zhang and Xiaoxue Zhao

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2014, vol. 11, issue 3, 505-540

Abstract: This article finds that the existence of strong kinship networks tends to limit state interference with private property use in rural China by protecting villagers against unwanted government land takings. It then distinguishes kinship networks from other kinds of social networks by showing that their deterrence effect against coercive takings is far more significant and resilient under conditions of prevalent rural‐urban migration than deterrence by neighborhood cooperatives and religious groups. Finally, the article attempts to identify and differentiate between various possible mechanisms behind these effects: it argues that kinship networks protect private property usage mainly through encouraging social reciprocity between kinsmen, which facilitates collective action against coercive takings. Kinship networks are more effective than neighborhood cooperatives or religious groups at sustaining reciprocity over long distances and, therefore, are less affected by rural‐urban migration. Altruism between kinsmen, however, does not emerge from the data as a major factor.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12048

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:11:y:2014:i:3:p:505-540

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().