Worthless Warnings? Testing the Effectiveness of Disclaimers in Mutual Fund Advertisements

Molly Mercer, Alan R. Palmiter and Ahmed E. Taha

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2010, vol. 7, issue 3, 429-459

Abstract: More than $11 trillion is invested in mutual funds in the United States. Mutual fund investors flock to funds with high past returns, despite there being little, if any, relationship between high past returns and high future returns. Because fund management fees are based on the amount of assets invested in their funds, however, fund companies regularly advertise the returns of their high‐performing funds. The SEC requires these advertisements to contain a disclaimer warning that past returns do not guarantee future returns and that investors could lose money in the funds. This article presents the results of an experiment that finds that this SEC‐mandated disclaimer is completely ineffective. The disclaimer neither reduces investors' propensity to invest in advertised funds nor diminishes their expectations regarding the funds' future returns. The experiment also suggests, however, that a stronger disclaimer—one that informs investors that high fund returns generally do not persist—would be much more effective.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01184.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:7:y:2010:i:3:p:429-459

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().