Notional defined‐contribution schemes: Old wine in new bottles?

Michael Cichon

International Social Security Review, 1999, vol. 52, issue 4, 87-105

Abstract: Until recently, most pension benefit formulae in social security schemes resembled each other. They were all defined‐benefit formulae that were either generous or mean, while defined‐contribution formulae were exclusively used in private and occupational pension schemes and some national provident funds. Then came the mandatory retirement savings model, introduced in Chile and subsequently in other Latin American countries. It did not seem possible that such a formula could be used on any large scale in the pay‐as‐you‐go environment of OECD pension schemes. In the early 1990s, however, Swedish social security experts devised the notional defined‐contribution (NDC) system: individual social insurance pension contribution records are converted into a fictitious savings amount at retirement, whereupon the defined‐contribution approach is followed. This article analyses how much of this approach is new. The conclusion is that it is a novel pension policy instrument rather than a new type of pension formula, and most of its potential financial and distributive effects could also be achieved by a classical, linear defined‐benefit formula. It is the packaging that differs and, in politics, that often is what matters.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-246X.00055

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:intssr:v:52:y:1999:i:4:p:87-105

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Social Security Review from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().