Academic Evaluation and Ranking of Economic Journals

Ianina Rossi and Alvaro Forteza ()

General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to serve as an input in the revision of the evaluation guidelines of the Department of Economics FCS – UDELAR (dECON). With this aim, we report on what is taken into account in academic evaluation around the world, and which are the most frequently used methods of evaluation and the sources of information related to them. Finally, we present the evaluation guidelines used in economic departments in Brazil, Chile, Spain and the United States and compare them with those currently used in dECON. This paper has three files attached with detailed information on references and points granted to journals in several academic institutions(http://www.decon.edu.uy/publica/publicac_.html).

Keywords: academic evaluation; bibliographic references; bibliometric indicators; citation analysis; journal ranking; opinion surveys. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
Date: 2005-02-21
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 28
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/get/papers/0502/0502070.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0502070

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in General Economics and Teaching from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).