Non-neutrality of economic policy: An application of the Tinbergen-Theil’s approach to a strategic context
Nicola Acocella () and
Giovanni Di Bartolomeo ()
Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
Issues of policy effectiveness and neutrality are widespread in the economic literature. They have been increasingly raised in specific contexts within the class of LQ (linear-quadratic) policy games in the last 20 years, notably with reference to monetary policy. The more general conditions ensuring nonneutrality in a strategic environment remain however to be inquired. We fill this gap by applying the classical theory of economic policy to a strategic context. This is also useful to highlight some existence conditions for policy game solutions. We restrict ourselves to the common LQ-games in a static perfect information framework, but our simple logic can be extended to other more general situations.
Keywords: LQ-policy games; policy ineffectiveness; controllability. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 E52 E61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 55 pages
Date: 2005-04-26, Revised 2005-04-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth and nep-mac
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 55
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mac/papers/0504/0504035.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Non-neutrality of economic policy: An application of the Tinbergen-Theil's approach to a strategic context (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0504035
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).