Unemployment Insurance with Moral Hazard in a Dynamic Economy

Stephen Williamson and Cheng Wang

Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: We study a dynamic model with positive gross flows between employment and unemployment. There is moral hazard associated with search effort and job-retention effort. A quantitative comparison of the unemployment insurance system currently in place in the United States with an optimal system shows that the optimal system reduces the steady state unemployment rate by 3.40 percentage points and increases output by 3.64\%. The optimal system involves a large subsidy for a transition from unemployment to employment and a large penalty for a transition from employment to unemployment.

JEL-codes: E (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995-06-15
Note: Zipped using PKZIP v2.04, encoded using uuencode v5.15. Zipped file includes 1 file -- cheng (body in TeX format) Macros included
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mac/papers/9506/9506002.pdf (application/pdf)
https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mac/papers/9506/9506002.ps.gz (application/postscript)

Related works:
Journal Article: Unemployment insurance with moral hazard in a dynamic economy (1996)
Working Paper: Unemployment Insurance with Moral Hazard in a Dynamic Economy (1996)
Working Paper: Unemployment Insurance with Moral Hazard in a Dynamic Economy (1995)
Working Paper: Unemployment Insurance with Moral Hazard in a Dynamic Economy (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9506002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Macroeconomics from University Library of Munich, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by EconWPA ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).