An Empirical Examination of Sample Selection Methods in the Context of Life Insurer Financial Distress

James M. Carson and Robert E. Hoyt

Journal of Insurance Issues, 2003, vol. 26, issue 2, 114-128

Abstract: This study empirically examines properties of matched-pair versus non matched- pair sampling methods in the context of financial distress for the U.S. life insurance industry. While the majority of prior insurer insolvency studies employed matched-pair sampling techniques to identify important variables and to classify and predict firms likely to become financially distressed, we provide empirical evidence that three solvency-related items are sample dependent: variables identified as important measures of insolvency, coefficients, and classification rates. Thus, empirical studies employing relatively small matched-pair samples are likely to yield sample specific results that are not fully generalizable to the relevant population of firms. Results apply directly to financial distress models and also extend to other research employing choice-based sampling methods that involve binary state models with skewed distribution of the two states of interest.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.insuranceissues.org/PDFs/262CH.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wri:journl:v:26:y:2003:i:2:p:114-128

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Insurance Issues is currently edited by James Barrese

More articles in Journal of Insurance Issues from Western Risk and Insurance Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by James Barrese ().