Relaxing Tax Competition through Public Good Differentation
Benjamin Zissimos and
Myrna Wooders
The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) from University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Abstract:
This paper argues that, because governments are able to relax tax competition through public good differentiation, traditionally high-tax countries have continued to set taxes at a relatively high rate even as markets have become more integrated. The key assumption is that firms vary in the extent to which public good provision reduces costs. We show that Leviathan governments are able to use this fact to relax the forces of tax competition, reducing efficiency. When firms can ‘vote with their feet’ tax competition leads firms to locate in ‘too many’ jurisdictions. A ‘minimum tax’ further relaxes tax competition, further reducing efficiency.
Keywords: asymmetric equilibrium; core-periphery; non-renegotiable minimum tax; tax competition; tax harmonization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 H21 H42 H73 R50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2005
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe, nep-pub and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/w ... issimoswooders05.pdf
Related works:
Working Paper: Relaxing Tax Competition through Public Good Differentiation (2006) 
Working Paper: Relaxing Tax Competition through Public Good Differentiation (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wrk:warwec:737
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) from University of Warwick, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Margaret Nash ().