DIFFERENT MODES OF OPEN INNOVATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
Valentina Lazzarotti () and
Raffaella Manzini ()
Additional contact information
Valentina Lazzarotti: Università Carlo Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti 22, 21053 Castellanza (VA), Italy
Raffaella Manzini: Università Carlo Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti 22, 21053 Castellanza (VA), Italy
International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 2009, vol. 13, issue 04, 615-636
Abstract:
Starting from the several conceptual and empirical studies about open innovation modes, this paper attempts to integrate them by suggesting a framework which reveals four basic ways to collaborate. Two variables are considered that represent the degree of openness for a company: (i) the number/type of partners with which the company collaborates, briefly labelled as "partner variety"; (ii) the number/type of phases of the innovation process that the company opens to external contributions, briefly labelled as "innovation funnel openness". By crossing these two variables, four basic modes of open innovation are identified:closed innovators,open innovators,specialized collaboratorsandintegrated collaborators. The framework shows its practical validity in an empirical study that is conducted in Italy with the specific aim at verifying whether companies can really be mapped using this framework, i.e. whether the four modes of open innovation can be found in real companies (framework applicability); whether different modes correspond to different companies' strategies, capabilities, organisational and managerial processes (framework explicative power and usefulness). The framework shows that, in some cases, being totally open in innovation activities is not the only and most suitable option, but that different degrees and ways of "openness" can be implemented successfully, as well as the totally closed option.
Keywords: Open innovation; technological collaboration; partner variety; R&D process; innovation funnel openness; modes of collaboration; innovation strategy; capabilities and processes; multiple case study; Italy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (51)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919609002443
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:13:y:2009:i:04:n:s1363919609002443
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S1363919609002443
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) is currently edited by Joe Tidd
More articles in International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().