THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NETWORK COMMITMENT, ANTECEDENTS, AND INNOVATION IN STRATEGIC INNOVATION NETWORKS

Magnus Olsén Hammarfjord and Tommy Roxenhall ()
Additional contact information
Magnus Olsén Hammarfjord: Department of Business, Economics and Law, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
Tommy Roxenhall: Department of Business, Economics and Law, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 2017, vol. 21, issue 04, 1-36

Abstract: Strategic innovation networks, formed to stimulate innovation performance and economic growth for members and regions via collaborative activities, have recently become increasingly common. Numerous researchers have noted the effect of network structure on innovation performance and also discussed the mediating role of commitment. Many studies suggest that commitment strongly mediates firm and network outcome and performance. Studies of organisational behaviour, relationship marketing, and human resources demonstrate that commitment leads to better firm performance, inter-firm cooperation, network performance, market knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing, future intentions, retention, and enforcement mechanisms. Strangely, studies of the relationship between commitment and innovation from a network perspective are lacking. This study investigates the relationships between commitment, its antecedents, and innovation performance in strategic innovation networks. The antecedents examined are expectation gap, shared values, ego network density, and ego network size. A questionnaire was emailed to all members of three Swedish strategic innovation networks in different industries and regions to collect data; 150 completed questionnaires were received for a 27% response rate. Multiple regression, path, and mediation analyses demonstrate that commitment is an important mediating variable when firms in strategic networks jointly develop innovations. Expectation gap and shared values are strongly related to commitment, but ego network density and ego network size are not; however, the last two variables directly affect innovation. This means that relational influence is more important for commitment than the structural effects, while structural effects are more significant for innovation.

Keywords: Network commitment; innovation; expectation gap; shared values; ego network density; ego network size; strategic innovation network (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919617500372
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:21:y:2017:i:04:n:s1363919617500372

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1363919617500372

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) is currently edited by Joe Tidd

More articles in International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().