From classical to modern opinion dynamics
Hossein Noorazar,
Kevin R. Vixie (),
Arghavan Talebanpour () and
Yunfeng Hu ()
Additional contact information
Hossein Noorazar: Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-3113, USA
Kevin R. Vixie: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-3113, USA
Arghavan Talebanpour: Department of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-3113, USA
Yunfeng Hu: Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-3113, USA
International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), 2020, vol. 31, issue 07, 1-60
Abstract:
In this age of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, there is rapidly growing interest in understanding network-enabled opinion dynamics in large groups of autonomous agents. The phenomena of opinion polarization, the spread of propaganda and fake news, and the manipulation of sentiment is of interest to large numbers of organizations and people. Whether it is the more nefarious players such as foreign governments that are attempting to sway elections or it is more open and above board, such as researchers who want to make large groups of people aware of helpful innovations, what is at stake is often significant.In this paper, we review opinion dynamics including the extensions of many classical models as well as some new models that deepen understanding. For example, we look at models that track the evolution of an individual’s power, that include noise, and that feature sequentially dependent topics, to name a few.While the first papers studying opinion dynamics appeared over 60 years ago, there is still a great deal of room for innovation and exploration. We believe that the political climate and the extraordinary (even unprecedented) events in the sphere of politics in the last few years will inspire new interest and new ideas.It is our aim to help those interested researchers understand what has already been explored in a significant portion of the field of opinion dynamics. We believe that in doing this, it will become clear that there is still much to be done.
Keywords: Opinion dynamics; social interactions; opinion formation; social network; social influence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0129183120501016
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijmpcx:v:31:y:2020:i:07:n:s0129183120501016
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S0129183120501016
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC) is currently edited by H. J. Herrmann
More articles in International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().