STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AS A MEANS OF PURSUING SUSTAINABILITY: TEN ADVANTAGES AND TEN CHALLENGES

Kirk Stinchcombe () and Robert B. Gibson ()
Additional contact information
Kirk Stinchcombe: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Robert B. Gibson: Environment and Resource Studies, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2001, vol. 03, issue 03, 343-372

Abstract: While strategic environmental assessment can be a powerful tool for fostering progress towards sustainability, effective implementation involves confronting a set of substantial challenges. This paper, based on Canadian and international literature and experience, outlines the ten most compelling advantages of strategic environmental assessment for sustainability and the ten main challenges faced in implementation.The ten advantages of the strategic environmental assessment for sustainability are that it• provides a process for integrated pursuit of sustainability objectives in policy making and planning;• operationalises sustainability principles;• improves the information base for policy making, planning and programme development;• is proactive and broad in ways that strengthen consideration of fundamental issues;• improves analysis of broad public purposes and alternatives;• facilitates proper attention to cumulative effects;• facilitates greater transparency and more effective public participation at the strategic level;• provides a framework for more effective and efficient project-level assessments;• provides a base for design and implementation of better projects where project-level assessment is not required; and• facilitates establishment of a more comprehensive overall system of sustainability application at all levels from the setting of decision objectives to the monitoring of implementations effects.The ten main challenges for effective implementation are• limited information and unavoidable uncertainties;• boundary-setting complexities;• primitive methodologies;• difficulties in defining the proper role of public participants and ensuring effective involvement;• co-ordination and integration of strategic assessment with assessment processes at other levels;• institutional resistance;• conflict between integrated assessment and bureaucratic fragmentation;• jurisdictional overlap;• limitations of the standard rational planning and policy making model; and• resistance to integration of strategic assessment in core decision making.The paper concludes with a discussion of the major implications.

Keywords: strategic environmental assessment; policy assessment; sustainability; environmental impact assessment; environmental assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333201000741
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:03:y:2001:i:03:n:s1464333201000741

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1464333201000741

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().