REFILLABLE VERSUS NON-REFILLABLE CONTAINERS THE IMPACT OF REGULATORY MEASURES ON PACKAGING MIX AND QUALITY CHOICES
Ida Ferrara and
Charles Plourde
Additional contact information
Charles Plourde: York University, Canada
Working Papers from York University, Department of Economics
Abstract:
With the continually declining percentage of soft drink sales in refillable bottles in favour of cans and PET bottles, despite a growing soft drink market, governments have become increasingly concerned about the alleged more environmentally harmful impacts of throw-away convenience packaging and tried to enact policies to induce consumers to switch to refillable glass bottles. In many cases, fully or partially refundable deposits have been opted for to provide consumers with the incentive to properly dispose of packaging, but not to switch between different container types, and thus, they may not constitute the most desirable solution. The effects of various regulatory measures on produceers' choices of packaging quality and mix in the presence of consumers with differing demand intensities are therefore analyzed to discern the least distortionary alternative.
Pages: 27 pages
Date: 1998-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dept.econ.yorku.ca/research/workingPapers/working_papers/refill4.pdf First version, 1998
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to dept.econ.yorku.ca:80 (nodename nor servname provided, or not known)
Related works:
Journal Article: Refillable versus non-refillable containers: the impact of regulatory measures on packaging mix and quality choices (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:yca:wpaper:1998_03
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from York University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Support ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).