International capital flows and economic growth in CESEE: a structural break in the great recession

Željko Bogdan (), Milan Deskar-Škrbić and Velimir Šonje ()
Additional contact information
Željko Bogdan: Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb
Velimir Šonje: Arhivanalitika and Zagreb School of Economics and Management

No 1404, EFZG Working Papers Series from Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb

Abstract: This paper deals with real effects of bank-intermediated international capital flows to 11 CESEE coun-tries 1997-2012. The purpose is to check for structural breaks in the short-run relationship between bank-intermediated capital flows and output growth since 2008. The relationship is investigated in dynamic panel growth regression framework. Results show that there was no systematic relationship between international banks' exposures and countries' growth rates at normal times. The relationship turned negative at times of crisis, implying that international banks did not cause or propagate negative output shocks in the period of great recession. Moreover, banks may have alleviated intensity of nega-tive shocks by resisting reduction of country exposures in line with contracting GDP. Asset and liability side of local banks' balance sheets are separated by different kinds of capital and liquidity buffers. So, effects of lending in local credit markets on GDP growth should be looked at separately from international component on the liability side of banks’ balance sheets. When interna-tional banks' exposures are replaced by local credit portfolios in panel growth regressions, the results change: (1) there is a positive relationship between credit to households and output growth: moreover, strength of positive relationship is magnified at times of crisis; (2) positive relationship between cor-porate credit and output growth does not change at times of crisis. Thus, crisis-related household sec-tor deleveraging may be much more costly in terms of output loss, than corporate sector deleveraging. Key policy implication is that maintaining the flow of credit to households has higher importance in combating the crisis in the short run than stimulating the flow of credit to non-financial corporations. Also, crisis-related household sector deleveraging may be much more costly in terms of output loss, than corporate sector deleveraging.

Keywords: capital flows; CESEE; economic growth; Great REcession; panel analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C3 F3 F41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18
Date: 2014-10-23
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-opm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://web.efzg.hr/repec/pdf/Clanak%2014-04.pdf First version, 2014 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zag:wpaper:1404

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EFZG Working Papers Series from Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by WPS ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).