‘Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth’: Analysing Donors’ Aid Statistics
Kunibert Raffer ()
Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 1998, vol. 1, issue 2, 1-20
Abstract:
Claiming that its definition of Official Development Assistance (ODA) has remained unchanged, the OECD concedes changes in interpretation broadening the concept’s scope. Discontinuities, inconsistencies in recording, items openly doubted to be ODA by the OECD, even expenditures officially declared not to satisfy the OECD’s own criteria have boosted ODA volumes considerably. In 1994 by nearly 50 per cent, as OECD sources show. Shares of ‘broadened’ ODA roughly doubled between 1989 and 1994 - a disturbing trend concealing decreases of proper aid to development. Independent auditing of aid statistics and some fundamental changes of aid practices are proposed.
Keywords: aid statistics; aid recording; reforms of aid. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.efzg.hr/default.aspx?id=2699 (text/html)
Abstract only available on-line
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zag:zirebs:v:1:y:1998:i:2:p:1-20
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, Trg J. F. Kennedy 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
http://www.efzg.hr/default.aspx?id=6045
Access Statistics for this article
Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business is currently edited by Soumitra Sharma
More articles in Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business from Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jurica Šimurina ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).