Does speculative news hurt productivity? Evidence from takeover rumors
Christian Andres,
Dmitry Bazhutov,
Douglas Cumming and
Peter Limbach
No 701, CFS Working Paper Series from Center for Financial Studies (CFS)
Abstract:
Speculative news on corporate takeovers may hurt productivity because uncertainty and threat of job loss cause anxiety, distraction, and reduced collaboration and morale among employees and managers. Using a panel of OECD-headquartered firms, we show that firm productivity temporarily declines upon announcements of speculative takeover rumors that do not materialize. This productivity dip is more pronounced for targets and for firms in countries with weaker employee rights and less long-term orientation. Abnormal stock returns mirror these results. The evidence fosters our understanding of potential real effects of speculative financial news and the costs of takeover threats.
Keywords: Distraction; Employee commitment; Employee rights; Fear of job loss; Productivity; Shareholder wealth; Takeover speculation; Distraction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D24 G00 G34 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-eff and nep-hrm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/270842/1/1840011246.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Does Speculative News Hurt Productivity? Evidence from Takeover Rumors (2024) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:cfswop:701
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4365129
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CFS Working Paper Series from Center for Financial Studies (CFS) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().