Did the Bologna Process Challenge the German Apprenticeship System? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Stephan Thomsen and Johannes Trunzer

No 690, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)

Abstract: Starting in 1999, the Bologna Process reformed the German five-year study system for a first degree into the three-year bachelor's (BA) system to harmonize study lengths in Europe and improve competitiveness. This reform unintentionally challenged the German apprenticeship system that offers three-year professional training for the majority of school leavers. Approximately 29% of new apprentices are university-eligible graduates from academic-track schools. We evaluate the effects of the Bologna reform on new highly educated apprentices using a generalized difference-in-differences design based on detailed administrative student and labor market data. Our estimates show that the average regional expansion in first-year BA students decreased the number of new highly educated apprentices by 3%-5%; average treatment effects on those indecisive at school graduation range between -18% and -29%. We reveal substantial gender and occupational heterogeneity: males in STEM apprenticeships experienced the strongest negative effects. The reform aggravated the skills shortage in the economy.

Keywords: Bologna Process; post-secondary education decisions; apprenticeships; higher education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 I28 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu and nep-lma
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/225325/1/GLO-DP-0690.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Did the Bologna Process Challenge the German Apprenticeship System? Evidence from a Natural Experiment (2024)
Working Paper: Did the Bologna Process Challenge the German Apprenticeship System? Evidence from a Natural Experiment (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:690

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().