Field experimental evidence on gender discrimination in hiring: Biased as Heckman and Siegelman predicted?

Stijn Baert

No 2015-44, Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel)

Abstract: Correspondence studies are nowadays viewed as the most compelling avenue to test for hiring discrimination. However, these studies suffer from one fundamental methodological problem, as formulated by Heckman and Siegelman (The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix, and R. Struyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America, 1993), namely the bias in their results in case of group differences in the variance of unobserved determinants of hiring outcomes. In this study, the authors empirically investigate this bias in the context of gender discrimination. They do not find significant evidence for the predicted bias.

Keywords: correspondence experiments; gender discrimination; unobserved heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 J16 J41 J71 M51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-hme
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2015-44
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/110920/1/827490070.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Field experimental evidence on gender discrimination in hiring: Biased as Heckman and Siegelman predicted? (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:201544

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().