Ideologieübergreifende Radikalisierung als sozialstrukturelles Problem. Überlegungen zur Trennschärfe von Begriffen und interdisziplinären Aufgaben der Radikalisierungsforschung
Bärbel Bongartz
No 2/2020, IU Discussion Papers - Social Sciences from IU International University of Applied Sciences
Abstract:
It is difficult to reach scientific agreement on concepts and explanations of the phenomenon of terrorism. One reason may be the diversity of terrorist acts, another is certainly the imprecise and careless use of the term. The struggle for a conceptual framing of the phenomenon of terrorism and a precise definition remains; some terrorism researchers, such as Christopher Daase, even argue that the search for the semantic core of terrorism should be abandoned (Daase, 2011, p. 29). This must not lead to abandoning research into the nature of terrorism. Rather, it is time to expand the phenomenon conceptually, in order to then specify it again in its diversity. A first theoretical appeal is to focus less on the concept of terrorism and more on facets of politically motivated crime, including hate crimes.
Keywords: Ideologieübergreifende Radikalisierung; theoretische Ansätze der Radikalisierungsforschung; interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit; Terrorismus; Hassverbrechen (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ger
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/216778/1/iubh-dp-sowi-2-2020.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:iubhso:22020
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IU Discussion Papers - Social Sciences from IU International University of Applied Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().