EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Diskursversagen durch moralische Vor- und Fehl-Urteile: Die ordonomische Perspektive

Ingo Pies

No 2021-06, Discussion Papers from Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics

Abstract: Dieser Artikel zeigt auf, wie das ordonomische Forschungsprogramm moralische Vorund Fehl-Urteile, insbesondere in Form intentionalistischer und moralistischer Fehlschlüsse, konstruktiv kritisiert und damit - als Ethik - konstruktive Beiträge liefert, einem Diskursversagen mit überlegenen Argumenten entgegenzutreten.

Keywords: Ordonomik; Wachstum; De-Growth; Klimapolitik; Moralparadoxon der Moderne; Diskursversagen; ordonomics; growth; de-growth; climate politics; moral paradox of modernity; discourse failure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ger and nep-hpe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/249254/1/1782394524.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:mlucee:202106

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:202106