A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs

Max Groneck, Alexander Ludwig and Alexander Zimper

No 73, SAFE Working Paper Series from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE

Abstract: Based on a cognitive notion of neo-additive capacities reflecting likelihood insensitivity with respect to survival chances, we construct a Choquet Bayesian learning model over the life-cycle that generates a motivational notion of neo-additive survival beliefs expressing ambiguity attitudes. We embed these neo-additive survival beliefs as decision weights in a Choquet expected utility life-cycle consumption model and calibrate it with data on subjective survival beliefs from the Health and Retirement Study. Our quantitative analysis shows that agents with calibrated neo-additive survival beliefs (i) save less than originally planned, (ii) exhibit undersaving at younger ages, and (iii) hold larger amounts of assets in old age than their rational expectations counterparts who correctly assess their survival chances. Our neo-additive life-cycle model can therefore simultaneously accommodate three important empirical findings on household saving behavior.

Keywords: Bayesian learning; likelihood insensitivity; ambiguity; Choquet expected utility; dynamic inconsistency; life-cycle hypothesis; saving puzzles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 D91 E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015, Revised 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-age, nep-mac, nep-mic and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/203286/1/safe-wp-073_3.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs (2016)
Working Paper: A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs (2014)
Working Paper: A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs (2013)
Working Paper: A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:safewp:73

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2515703

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SAFE Working Paper Series from Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().