Distortion of probability and outcome information in risky decisions

Michael L. DeKay, Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia and Paul S. Fischbeck

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, vol. 109, issue 1, pages 79-92

Abstract: Substantial evidence indicates that information is distorted during decision making, but very few studies have assessed the distortion of probability and outcome information in risky decisions. In two studies involving six binary decisions (e.g., banning blood donations from people who have visited England, because of "mad cow disease"), student and nonstudent participants distorted their evaluations of probability and outcome information in the direction of their preferred decision alternative and used these biased evaluations to update their preferences. Participants also evaluated the utilities of possible outcomes more positively when the outcomes could follow only from the preferred alternative and more negatively when they could follow only from the competing alternative. Such circular reasoning is antithetical to the normative consequentialist principles underlying decision analysis. Presenting numerical information as precise values or as ranges of values did not significantly affect information distortion, apparently because the manipulation did not affect perceived ambiguity as intended.

Keywords: Information; distortion; Bidirectional; reasoning; Implied; dominance; Decision; analysis; Expected; utility; theory; Consequentialism; Ambiguity; Multilevel; modeling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WP2 ... 568238dbfee0e6b5dd43
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:109:y:2009:i:1:p:79-92

Access Statistics for this article

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes is edited by John M. Schaubroeck

More articles in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().