Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions
Daniel Bergan,
Alan Gerber and
Dean Karlan
Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Abstract:
We conducted a field experiment to measure the effect of exposure to newspapers on political behavior and opinion. Before the 2005 Virginia gubernatorial election, we randomly assigned individuals to a Washington Post free subscription treatment, a Washington Times free subscription treatment, or a control treatment. We find no effect of either paper on political knowledge, stated opinions, or turnout in post-election survey and voter data. However, receiving either paper led to more support for the Democratic candidate, suggesting that media slant mattered less in this case than media exposure. Some evidence from voting records also suggests that receiving either paper led to increased 2006 voter turnout.
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (269)
Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00252.pdf
Related works:
Journal Article: Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions (2009)
Working Paper: Does The Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:natura:00252
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta (fpagnotta@uchicago.edu).