Social Security Replacement Rates for Alternative Earnings Benchmarks

Olivia Mitchell and John W.R. Phillips
Additional contact information
John W.R. Phillips: National Institute of Aging

Working Papers from University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center

Abstract: Social Security reform proposals are often presented in terms of their differential impacts on hypothetical or ‘example’ workers. Our work explores how different benchmarks produce different replacement rate outcomes. We use the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to evaluate how Social Security benefit replacement rates differ for actual versus hypothetical earner profiles, and we examine whether these findings are sensitive to alternative definitions of replacement rates. We find that workers with the median HRS profile would be estimated to receive benefits worth 55% of lifetime average earnings, versus 48% for the SSA medium scaled profile. Since US policymakers tend to prefer a replacement rate measure tied to workers’ own past earnings, using these metrics would yield higher replacement rates compared to commonly used scaled illustrative profiles. However, benchmarks that use population as opposed to individual earnings measures to compare individual worker benefits to pre-retirement consumption produce lower replacement rates for HRS versus hypothetical earners.

Date: 2006-05
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mrrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/Papers/pdf/wp116.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mrr:papers:wp116

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center
Address: P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by MRRC Administrator ().